We Are Stardust, We Are Pond Scum

July 21st, 2008. By Andrew

There’s a term from 1984, doublethink, which essentially means “the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.”  In the context of 1984 it represents a means of fascist mind control: as in if the government tells you one thing on Monday, and then something completely different on Tuesday, you’d damn well better believe what they said to be true on Tuesday despite the obvious contradiction in your head.  It is a bad thing in this context, however, since we live in a universe of paradoxes, I believe it’s actually an important ability to have.  Often in this universe, two seemingly mutually exclusive ideas are both true.  One example I was thinking of a few minutes ago is humanity.  I feel that we are simultaneously worthless debauched immoral dregs, and at the same time godly and beautiful.  How can this be?  How can we be both slimy scum and perfect god-like beings?

I’ll let you wrestle with the larger question of how two seemingly contradictory ideas can be true since I can’t really answer that anyway.  I’ll just tell you why I think each of those ideas is true.  First the pond scum.  Well, it’s actually quite literal in a way.  Life on this planet started, as far as I know, in some sort of primordial soup.  Billions of years ago, some slime in a tidal pool started to make copies of itself, yadda yadda yadda, and here we are: hence pond scum.  Furthermore, I do believe we were some form of rodentia and some point.  These are all things that we don’t treat with much respect to say the least, yet they are us.  We also do god-awful things all the time.  War, rape, murder, and taking advantage of people are all prevalent in the world.  Humans have no limit of  cruelty, sadism and selfishness: hence, immoral and debauched.

But we are also godly.  We have the ability to create.  We can tap into our vast, probably infinite, imaginations for ideas that we can then turn into reality; out of nothing, there is something.  We have compassion, understanding, and empathy.  We do selfless things: soldiers throw themselves on grenades to save their friends, people give their lives to their children and to other people all the time.  We create art and appreciate beauty.  As far as we know we’re the only life in the universe and we are able to have understanding, to recognize patterns.  We may be the sole manifestation of the universe trying to understand itself, and thus we represent a dawning magnificent awareness.  We have unlimited potential for good as well.  And we are, also quite literally, stardust.  Our atoms were forged billions of years ago in celestial fusion reactors: hence godly and beautiful.

I hope I’ve successfully demonstrated that both of these ideas are in fact viable, and that they both could be true.  But how can this be?  How can we be both divine and profane?  Perhaps humanity is a contronym, a word which is it’s own antonym, like awful.  Humanity is awful: 1) Extremely bad or unpleasant; terrible  2) Filled with awe, especially filled with or displaying great reverence.  If the word awful can be two things at once, why can’t we?

  1. 1 Picklegnome
    July 22nd, 2008 at 3:20 pm
    That’s like saying a plus sign (+) is both a horizontal line and a vertical line. It’s not that it has to be one of these mutually exclusive things, it’s that each of these things is an intersecting component of a greater whole.

    Reply to Picklegnome

    1. 1 Andrew
      July 22nd, 2008 at 6:45 pm

      Isn’t a plus sign both? It is also the synergy of the two. So really, I’d say it’s all three things; a horizontal line, a vertical line, and the synergy of the two.

      Reply to Andrew

  2. 2 NickL
    July 22nd, 2008 at 5:31 pm

    How can two things be true and contradictory…

    Another example would be science. Not as a whole, but in the comparison of one theory when it gets replaced by a new theory. These two theories are incommensurable (due to lack of depth of knowledge in the newer one), and yet they need to be assessed to see which should progress in science and which to be abandoned (in the current scheme of scientific revolution). Both theories share the same outcomes, but may have different ad-hoc principles, different background assumptions, or different breadth in the domain they cover.

    Reply to NickL

  3. 3 Mal
    July 23rd, 2008 at 1:46 am

    Isn’t a plus sign defined as much or more by the white space than the lines?

    Reply to Mal

  4. 4 martha
    July 23rd, 2008 at 8:29 pm

    GOD IS DEEAAAADDDDD

    Reply to martha

  5. 5 Maarten Spreij
    August 2nd, 2008 at 11:48 am

    It’s a cruel, dark and dangerous world. It’s also a beautiful world.

    “One example I was thinking of a few minutes ago is humanity.”

    Humanity is uhm, lots and lots of people who do different things, and the same people do different things at different times, so yes – we’re both stardust and pondscum, I don’t have difficulty accepting both.. maybe I’m missing the point?

    Reply to Maarten Spreij

  6. 6 Andrew
    August 4th, 2008 at 8:33 am

    Yes, it’s not just the mass of humanity. It’s all of us, each individual is both

    Reply to Andrew


Leave a reply

  1. You will post the following soon.
    Go ahead and start typing.